首页> 外文OA文献 >Sensory and physico-psychological metaphor\ud comprehension in children with ASD: a preliminary\ud study on the outcomes of a treatment
【2h】

Sensory and physico-psychological metaphor\ud comprehension in children with ASD: a preliminary\ud study on the outcomes of a treatment

机译:感官和生理心理隐喻 对自闭症儿童的理解:初步\ ud 研究治疗结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent research into difficulties in figurative language in children with ASD highlighted\udthat it is possible to devise training interventions to overcome these difficulties by teaching specific\udstrategies. This study describes how children with ASD can improve their capability to explain\udmetaphors with a treatment. Two types of metaphors, in the “X is Y” form, were addressed:\udsensory and physico-psychological. To face the difficulties posed by these metaphors, the adult\udtaught two strategies: inserting the connective “is like” between “X” and “Y”, which transforms the\udmetaphor into a simile; comparing “X” and “Y” by means of thinking maps. Two tests of metaphor\udcomprehension were used, one based on sensory and the other on physico-psychological metaphors.\udSixteen 10 year-old children participated into the study, including an experimental group formed by\ud8 children with ASD (n = 4) which had received the treatment, and a control group (n = 4) which had\udnot, and 8 typically-developing (TD) children. At the post-test, the experimental group significantly\udoutperformed the controls in explaining both types of metaphors, but only in the sensory metaphors\uddid their performances reach TD children’s levels. These results illuminate how clinical treatment\udcan positively influence the developmental trajectories of metaphor comprehension.
机译:对ASD儿童比喻语言方面的困难的最新研究突显了\ ud,可以设计训练干预措施,通过讲授特定的\策略来克服这些困难。这项研究描述了患有ASD的儿童如何通过治疗提高他们解释\ udmetaphors的能力。讨论了两种类型的隐喻,即“ X是Y”形式:\ udsensory和生理心理。为了应对这些隐喻带来的困难,成人\儿童学会了两种策略:在“ X”和“ Y”之间插入连接词“像”,从而将“儿童”隐喻转化为比喻。通过思维图比较“ X”和“ Y”。使用了两种隐喻\理解测试,一种基于感官的隐喻测试,另一种基于生理-心理隐喻的测试。\ ud十六名10岁的儿童参加了这项研究,其中包括一个由\ ud8名ASD儿童组成的实验组(n = 4)接受过这种治疗的儿童,以及对照组(n = 4)有\不知道的儿童和8名典型发育(TD)儿童。在后期测试中,实验组在解释两种类型的隐喻上均明显优于对照组,但仅在感官隐喻上才达到了TD儿童的水平。这些结果阐明了临床治疗如何有效地影响隐喻理解的发展轨迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号